Bank Foreclosures Information

Information, Articles and News About Bank Foreclosures

December 15th, 2008

New York: Swimming In Foreclosures

New York foreclosures are starting to be an issue. An example is the housing situation in Broome County, where 173 foreclosures were already filed from July up to September. For every 514 properties in the area, one home was being repossessed.

For 2008, an estimate of more than 50,000 people who own a property in the state of New York filed for foreclosure, specifically in Mid-Hudson Valley and in the western part of the state.

According to Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli, the increase in New York foreclosures can be a threat to state governments as the revenue comes from the 44 percent of tax properties.

DiNapoli indeed made sense because a property tax may increase if foreclosures in the state go higher.

Mayor Matthew T. Ryan said that 39 percent from tax properties will be accountable for Binghamton City’s estimated income for 2009.

New York is 36th in terms of foreclosures, particularly in the Mid-Hudson Valley, some parts of Southern Tier and Finger Lakes a year ago. Binghamton City is planning to increase 14 percent in tax property by 2009, which is 90 percent more than what was allowed by the Constitution. Ryan is hoping that the government will do something about it.

In every 423 properties in Finger Lakes, one home is being filed as foreclosed in 2008. One out of 514 properties in Broome County, and one out of 319 houses in Dutchess County. Orange County ranked as the highest in foreclosures as one home was filed as foreclosed for every 205 properties.

For 2008, majority in foreclosure filings came from six counties in upstate New York because of the number of mortgages considered as sub prime. A decrease of 31 percent in property sales from January to June of last year in New York City was considered very significant. Mid-Hudson ranked second with 28 percent.

Reports said that the properties are reasonably priced in the upstate area and majority are standard homes in place of luxurious homes due to foreclosures.

Related Posts:

September 16th, 2008

New York Bank Foreclosures Linked to Fraud

A report released on 07/31/08 talks about existent loopholes in lending laws of New York, that unscrupulous characters of the mortgage industry have used to their benefit.

New York City, New York

The New York State Commission of Investigations has found that it is the minority communities that are predominantly besieged by this trend. They found that there was double the number of Hispanic and African-American borrowers in the sub-prime market as compared to white borrowers.

Mary Biunno, speaking on behalf of the commission said instances have come to the fore where estate agents are doubling up as mortgage brokers, especially in minority dominated neighborhoods, managing to attract a fair amount of hopeful people. Bills are presented to clients for services rendered in the form of commissions and fees for loans or sales being organized. Also, they have on their side the attorneys and appraisers who the borrowers think are working for their benefit.

The commission also stated that there should be an increase in regulatory safeguards to protect New York’s lenders from preying lenders. Loans in the sub-prime market have been linked to growing menace of New York bank foreclosures. Speaking of figures, last year foreclosures on sub-prime loans was 59% of the total New York bank foreclosures.

The chairman of the commission, Alfred Lerner, said in a press release that the prime objective of the report was investigating mortgage fraud in the sub-prime market; however it was not possible to ignore the statistics in lending patterns. Greedy brokers pushing people of minority communities who qualify for prime loans into taking sub-prime ones which are high risk is catching on. A fair amount of conspicuously bad cases showed voracious practices on part of lenders where it was quite clear that the borrower couldn’t possibly pay the loan off.

In order to prevent similar problems in the future the commission made some recommendations. These include, brokers being banned from donning the dual role hat because when one person acted as both the agent and the broker, there was an increased chance of criminal behavior and conflict of interest.

Related Posts: